Commons Select Committee of Privileges
The Commons Select Committee of Privileges is a Committee appointed by the House of Commons to consider specific matters relating to privileges referred to it by the House.
It came into being on 7 January 2013 as one half of the replacements for the Committee on Standards and Privileges. The latter committee was divided into the Committee on Standards and Committee of Privileges in order that the Standards Committee might employ lay members.
Membership
[edit]As of March 2025, the members of the committee were as follows:[1]
Changes since 2024
[edit]| Date | Outgoing Member & Party |
Constituency | → | New Member & Party |
Constituency | Source | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 March 2025 | Mark Ferguson MP (Labour) | Gateshead Central and Whickham | → | Michael Wheeler MP (Labour) | Worsley and Eccles | Hansard | ||
2019–2024 Parliament
[edit]As of March 2023, the members of the committee were as follows:[2]
| Member | Party | Constituency | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Rt Hon Harriet Harman KC MP (Chair) | Labour | Camberwell and Peckham | |
| Andy Carter MP | Conservative | Warrington South | |
| Alberto Costa MP | Conservative | South Leicestershire | |
| Allan Dorans MP | Scottish National Party | Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock | |
| Sir Charles Walker MP | Conservative | Broxbourne | |
| Yvonne Fovargue MP | Labour | Makerfield | |
| Sir Bernard Jenkin MP | Conservative | Harwich and North Essex | |
2017–2019 Parliament
[edit]| Member | Party | Constituency | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Green MP (Chair) | Labour | Stretford and Urmston | |
| Sir Paul Beresford MP | Conservative | Mole Valley | |
| Douglas Chapman MP | Scottish National Party | Dunfermline and West Fife | |
| Bridget Phillipson MP | Labour | Houghton and Sunderland South | |
| Gary Streeter MP | Conservative | South West Devon | |
| John Stevenson MP | Conservative | Carlisle | |
| Sir Christopher Chope MP | Conservative | Christchurch | |
Investigation into Boris Johnson
[edit]The Privileges Committee of the House of Commons had a parliamentary injury over the investigation into Boris Johnson's breach of lockdown rules during the COVID-19 pandemic, concerning four specific assertions made by the then Prime Minister Boris Johnson at Prime Minister's Questions about "the legality of activities in 10 Downing Street and the Cabinet Office under Covid regulations", events commonly referred to as Partygate. The investigation is concerned with whether Johnson misled the Commons when he made these statements.
The Committee published their final report on 15 June.[3] Johnson resigned over the investigation after having been sent a draft copy of the committee's report. The Committee had voted on the final report text and unanimously supported it. They concluded that Johnson had deliberately misled the House, a contempt of Parliament. They said that, had he still been an MP, they would have recommended a 90 day suspension.[3] If that had happened, it would have been the second longest suspension since 1949.[4][5][3][6]
The Committee concluded that Johnson's actions were "more serious" because they were committed when he was Prime Minister. They noted that there was no precedent for a PM being found to have deliberately misled Parliament.[7] The report stated that Johnson tried to "rewrite the meaning" of COVID rules "to fit his own evidence" for example that "a leaving gathering or a gathering to boost morale was a lawful reason to hold a gathering."[8] They concluded he was guilty of further contempt of Parliament and that he breached confidentiality requirements by criticising the Committee's provisional findings when he resigned. They said he was complicit in a "campaign of abuse" against those investigating him.[3]
The Commons debated the report on 19 June 2023. Labour forced a vote and the Commons voted 354 to 7 in support, with a large number of abstentions. This was an absolute majority of the Commons. 118 Conservative MPs, including 15 ministers, voted for the report and 225 abstained. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak had earlier said he had other commitments, and did not attend the debate and refused to say how he would have voted.
References
[edit]- ^ "Committee of Privileges membership appointed". Committee of Privileges. UK. 5 November 2024. Retrieved 7 March 2025.
- ^ "Membership - Committee of Privileges". UK Parliament. Retrieved 22 March 2023.
- ^ a b c d "Boris Johnson report latest: Covid bereaved seek ex-PM apology after Partygate report". BBC News. 15 June 2023.
- ^ Magazine, Perspective (15 June 2023). "What happens now the Privileges Committee's report on Johnson has been released?".
- ^ Balls, Katy (15 June 2023). "Boris Johnson's fall from grace has given Rishi Sunak an opportunity". inews.co.uk.
- ^ Sparrow, Andrew (15 June 2023). "Boris Johnson would face 90-day suspension if he were still MP, says privileges committee – as it happened". The Guardian – via www.theguardian.com.
- ^ Marquis, Josh Salisbury, Bill McLoughlin, Claudia (15 June 2023). "Tory civil war tensions as MPs given vote on Boris Partygate report". Evening Standard.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Castle, Stephen (15 June 2023). "Boris Johnson Misled Parliament Over Covid Lockdown Parties, Report Says". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 15 June 2023. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
External links
[edit]
 | This article related to the politics of the United Kingdom, or its predecessor or constituent states, is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |